CalibratedDecisions.

Repo · Benchmarks & research

jev-healthcare-lab

Open experiment comparing TypeSafe Jev vs DeepSeek on 96 healthcare tasks across 12 scenarios (quality, latency, cost) with per-task data and…

Open github.com ↗

From the repository

Jev vs DeepSeek 医疗任务对比:12 类场景、96 项测试,效果、耗时与费用一览。 | Jev vs DeepSeek on 96 healthcare tasks across 12 scenarios: quality, latency, cost and open experiment data.

benchmarkchinese-nlpclinical-nlpclinical-trialsdatasetsdeepseekevidence-based-medicinehallucination-detectionhealthcareinformation-extractionjevllm-evaluationmedicalmedical-aimedical-nlpmodel-comparisonnamed-entity-recognitionocrspeech-recognitiontraditional-chinese-medicine

How builders describe it

Jev vs DeepSeek 医疗任务对比:12 类场景、96 项测试,效果、耗时与费用一览。 | Jev vs DeepSeek on 96 healthcare tasks across 12 scenarios: quality, latency, cost and open experiment data.
Open experiment comparing TypeSafe Jev vs DeepSeek on 96 healthcare tasks across 12 scenarios (quality, latency, cost) with per-task data and prompts—honest about where Jev is weak.

The decision Jev makes

Benchmark questions with known answers, to check accuracy and confidence.

Where it fits

Head-to-head tests, calibration studies and independent research into how well Jev decides, how fast, and at what cost. All 682 benchmarks & research projects →

Related projects