CalibratedDecisions.

Repo · Benchmarks & research

jev-search-rerank-eval

Does a TypeSafe Jev rerank beat embedding search?

Open github.com ↗

From the repository

Does a TypeSafe Jev rerank beat embedding search? Graded relevance eval (9,831 pairs, 164 zh/en queries) over the Agent Skills Hub catalog, with the judge-circularity bias measured.

bge-m3evaluationinformation-retrievalndcgrerankingtypesafe-jev

How builders describe it

Does a TypeSafe Jev rerank beat embedding search? Graded relevance eval (9,831 pairs, 164 zh/en queries) over the Agent Skills Hub catalog, with the judge-circularity bias measured.
A graded relevance evaluation of Jev as a reranker: 9,831 labelled pairs from 164 queries over a 33,047-item skills catalog, comparing Jev score reranks with BM25, bge-m3, and rank fusion.

The decision Jev makes

Benchmark questions with known answers, to check accuracy and confidence.

Where it fits

Head-to-head tests, calibration studies and independent research into how well Jev decides, how fast, and at what cost. All 682 benchmarks & research projects →

Related projects