CalibratedDecisions.

Repo · Benchmarks & research

Jev Synthetic Survey

Independent evaluation running Jev jev-1.13.0 and GPT-4.1 as the same 300 Twin-2K-500 synthetic survey respondents across 24,596 paired cells,…

Open github.com ↗

From the repository

Jev vs GPT-4.1 as synthetic survey respondents on Twin-2K-500. How you ask mattered more than which model you used.

behavioral-economicsbenchmarkcalibrationdigital-twindigital-twinsjevllmllm-evaluationprobability-elicitationsurvey-simulationsynthetic-surveytwin-2k-500

How builders describe it

Independent evaluation running Jev jev-1.13.0 and GPT-4.1 as the same 300 Twin-2K-500 synthetic survey respondents across 24,596 paired cells, finding that asking a yes/no item as a Noul rather than a Choice moved results more than the model gap, at a thirty-fourth of the cost.

The decision Jev makes

Benchmark questions with known answers, to check accuracy and confidence.

Where it fits

Head-to-head tests, calibration studies and independent research into how well Jev decides, how fast, and at what cost. All 682 benchmarks & research projects →

Related projects