Repo · Benchmarks & research
rerank-bench-jev
Production reranker benchmark: TypeSafe Jev vs Qwen3-Reranker-0.6B on BEIR SciFact and NFCorpus — nDCG@10, cost/query and p50/p95 latency.
Open github.com ↗From the repository
Production reranker benchmark: TypeSafe Jev vs Qwen3-Reranker-0.6B on BEIR SciFact and NFCorpus — nDCG@10, cost/query and p50/p95 latency. Quality is indistinguishable; Jev is ~2x faster, Qwen ~4x cheaper. From the team at denser.ai
How builders describe it
Production reranker benchmark: TypeSafe Jev vs Qwen3-Reranker-0.6B on BEIR SciFact and NFCorpus — nDCG@10, cost/query and p50/p95 latency. Quality is indistinguishable; Jev is ~2x faster, Qwen ~4x cheaper. From the team at denser.ai.
Benchmark of Jev as a production reranker against Qwen3-Reranker-0.6B on BEIR SciFact and NFCorpus. Ranking quality is a wash, Jev runs about twice as fast with a much tighter tail, and the cross-encoder costs roughly a quarter as much. Every raw API response is committed, so the numbers recompute…
The decision Jev makes
Benchmark questions with known answers, to check accuracy and confidence.
Where it fits
Head-to-head tests, calibration studies and independent research into how well Jev decides, how fast, and at what cost. All 682 benchmarks & research projects →